“It’s okay to ship m/f!” “Shipping m/f is better than shipping m/m or f/f sometimes!” “Don’t let anybody get you down for shipping a man and a woman together!” Don’t listen any of that. I’m here. I’m going to mandate yaoi and yuri and if you do anything else I will vaporize you out of this world
One of the worst parts of current internet culture is that it makes good old fashioned complaining so difficult. I don’t wanna cancel anyone or bully anyone, I’m not trying to form a hate mob I’m not calling anyone out, i just wanna bitch about something. Because complaining is fun, good for you, even. Is that too much to ask? Where is the room for shooting the shit?
Having absolutely everyone involved in every aspect of economy is absolutely inefficient in the extreme and the primary critique of absolute democracy. there aren’t any modernly relevant political ideologies that actually refuse to contend with that. the problems are, again, not that there is in some sense positions of authority. to organize anything meaningfully is to utilize authority, regardless of how much devolution you purport to have. the interests for which political and economic organs are utilized is what matters, and those interests are generally those of the ruling class. in all of liberal democracies, fascist states, and modern monarchies the represented class is that of the bourgeoisie. Inversely, for socialist government, the represented class is that of the proletariat. the particular form of governance of socialist states tends to converge on a similar formation: nested councils. councils of workers are elected from a given industry who then elect to higher councils and so on; it is prominent enough that the USSR was named after it. the Soviet style of democracy, the nested councils, has been a provably effective way of supporting the objectives of the proletariat, which is an actually meaningful metric of democratic governance. quality of life, trust in the government, even traditional liberal metrics like year over year GDP growth are near universally stronger in socialist states when factoring for levels of development. it is, statistically, the preferred mode of governance for the proletariat.
